U.S. Wary of Aristide’s Return to Haiti
© Voice of America
By David Gollust, State Department
February 9, 2011
The U.S. State Department said Wednesday the early return to Haiti of exiled former president Jean-Bertrand Aristide would be an “unfortunate distraction” from the country’s run-off presidential election campaign. The former leader, who has lived in South Africa for the last several years, has been granted a Haitian passport.
Officials here are not saying what the United States has told the Haitian and South African governments about Mr. Aristide’s prospective return home.
But the State Department is making clear publicly that it would consider such a move, in the midst of the campaign for Haiti’s March 20 presidential run-off election, a bad idea.
Mr. Aristide has been in South Africa most of the time since fleeing Haiti in 2004 amid a popular rebellion.
The former Roman Catholic priest became Haiti’s first democratically-elected president in 1991 but was quickly ousted by the military.
He was restored to power after U.S. intervention in 1994 but driven from office a decade later amid charges of corruption and autocratic rule.
After former Haitian dictator Jean-Claude Duvalier made a surprise return from exile last month, Mr. Aristide has said he, too, would like to return home.
But it would come at a sensitive time as Haiti struggles to recover from last year’s devastating earthquake, and a bitterly disputed first-round president vote in late November.
At a news briefing, State Department Spokesman P.J. Crowley said he is unaware of specific travel plans by Mr. Aristide but that the United States “would hate to see” any action that introduces divisiveness into the election process.
“I think that we would be concerned that if former president Aristide returns to Haiti before the election, it would prove to be an unfortunate distraction,” said P.J. Crowley. “The people of Haiti should be evaluating the two candidates that will participate in the runoff, and that I think that should be their focus.”
The State Department also criticized former leader Duvalier’s return but later welcomed steps to prosecute him for corruption during his rule.
Spokesman Crowley said any action by any player that distracts from getting Haiti the kind of government it needs to rebuild would be “unwise”.
The March 20 run-off, scheduled after a lengthy dispute about the November vote-count, pits a former Haitian first lady and college administrator Mirlande Manigat againsted popular entertainer Michel Martelly.
Mr. Aristide reportedly still has wide popular support but is considered a polarizing figure. He has said he would limit himself to teaching if he returned, and his spokeswoman rejected the notion his return would be ill-timed.
The following article is reprinted with permission from Workers World.
Growing rich on misery
© Workers World
By G. Dunkel
Dec 18, 2010
It read like the start of a request to give generously. “Earthquakes in Haiti and Chile, floods in Pakistan, a drought in China, storms in Australia, a volcano in Iceland … an ever increasing stream of natural disasters leaving millions of people dead, sick, starving or homeless and billions of dollars in lost global economic activity.”
But the Dec. 4 conference at the Wharton School of Business, entitled “From Haiti to Pakistan: A Year of Disasters,” was not about how to help people throughout the world suffering from the effects of these natural disasters. Its focus was on entrepreneurship, the art of quickly and innovatively responding to rapidly changing events to guarantee maximum profits.
The press release for the conference in Wharton’s student newspaper emphasized exploring and examining “the challenges and opportunities of disaster response.” When a business executive or business student hears the word “opportunities,” they immediately complete the phrase with “for profit.”
Wharton held its conference with big shots from government and strategic consultancies like Deloitte and McKinsey & Company. They wanted to make sure they didn’t create more problems than profits by operating without any regard for the feelings and needs of people.
But there is another approach to disasters, called solidarity. After the earthquake in Haiti, unions and churches, community groups and charities of all kinds opened up their hearts, efforts and pocketbooks to relieve the obvious distresses of the Haitian people.
More than half the people in the United States contributed to the Haitian relief effort. Similar outpourings of solidarity occurred throughout the world. Cuba, a small socialist country lying about 75 miles across the Windward Passage from Haiti, reinforced its medical teams already working there.
The U.S. military’s occupation of Haiti and other maneuvers of the U.S. government mangled the expression of this solidarity. But no one can deny it existed, was powerful and helped the Haitian people far more than the actions of a few entrepreneurs who “saw opportunities.”
Articles copyright 1995-2010 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.